October 12, 2005
Redundancy without... what?!
Just a small excerpt from a 30-page request-for-quote that came our way recently…
The system should be designed with no duplication but should be provided for all levels of redundancy.
To quote Charles Babbage, "I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question" - or, in this case, such a requirement. And then again - maybe I am…
Posted by roam at October 12, 2005 07:08 PM
Comments
Lol, yes, silly wording. I think what they mean though is that they want the system to be built to be redundant but none of that redundancy should be implemented right away. Or something. Really, anybody that writes a 30 page RFQ should be shot.
Posted by: Ivan Tumanov at October 13, 2005 04:46 AMPost a comment
